Hervey

Hervey v. Mercury Casualty Co.

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 890·185 Cal. App. 4th 954·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 900
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2010B215470California4,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Lauren N. Hervey (Hervey) purchased an automobile insurance policy from defendant and respondent Mercury Casualty Company (Mercury). Hervey alleges Mercury breached the policy by offsetting uninsured motorist payments due her for injuries suffered in an automobile accident with the amount Mercury paid Hervey under the medical expense coverage in the same policy for the same accident. According to Hervey, Mercury took the offset notwithstanding the title of the medical expense coverage endorsement: “MEDICAL EXPENSE—NO EXCESS, NO REIMBURSEMENT.” The operative terms of that endorsement deleted only the medical expense payments offset or reimbursement provisions from liability recoveries from those responsible for the accident. The medical expense endorsement did not delete the offset or reimbursement provision contained in the uninsured motorist section of the policy, the provision upon which Mercury relied for its right of offset for medical expense payments made by Mercury. We hold that the trial court properly sustained without leave to amend Mercury’s demurrer to Hervey’s class action complaint because the policy was not reasonably…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.