Paterno

Paterno v. Superior Court of Orange County

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 4th 1342·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 872·78 Cal. Rptr. 3d 244·36 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1882
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2008G038555California5,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

— Here we consider whether a plaintiff in a defamation action subject to the constitutional malice standard established the requisite “good cause” (Code Civ. Proc., §425.16, subd. (g)) to conduct discovery, thereby delaying resolution of the defendant’s pending anti-SLAPP motion. We conclude that where, as here, the plaintiff fails to demonstrate the allegedly defamatory statements are provably false factual assertions — which the plaintiff must do to establish the necessary probability of prevailing on its defamation claim — no good cause exists to conduct discovery concerning actual malice. We therefore grant the writ petition, and direct the trial court to vacate its discovery order and enter a new order denying plaintiff’s discovery motion.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff and real party in interest Ampersand Publishing (Ampersand) is the corporate owner of the Santa Barbara News-Press. Wendy McCaw, its principal, publishes the newspaper. Defendant and petitioner Susan Paterno directs the journalism program at Chapman University in Orange, California, and is a senior writer for the American Journalism Review, a magazine published by the University of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.