Gerlach

Pueblo Radiology Medical Group, Inc. v. Gerlach

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 4th 826·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 831·77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 880
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 2008B194106California1,269 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

— Appellant Pueblo Radiology Medical Group, Inc. (Pueblo), filed a breach of contract action against Vitascan, Inc. (Vitascan), and respondents J. Dalton Gerlach (Gerlach) and Daniel Parker (Parker). The allegations against Gerlach and Parker were that they were the alter egos of Vitascan. The trial court found they were not and judgment was entered accordingly, including an award of attorney fees to them under Civil Code section 1717. Pueblo asserts the award of fees was premature because there has been no determination of whether a breach of contract occurred. We disagree. The action was on the contract. The trial court’s finding that Gerlach and Parker were not personally liable was a favorable termination of the case as to each of them as individuals. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pueblo entered into a contract with Vitascan to provide interpretation services of imaging scans from the Vitascan mobile Imatron electron beam tomography scanner. Gerlach signed the contract on behalf of Vitascan. Gerlach was Vitascan’s president, and Parker was Vitascan’s secretary. Gerlach and Parker were the sole shareholders.

The contract was for the period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.