In Re BCBG Overtime Cases

Caution
163 Cal. App. 4th 1293·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 874·78 Cal. Rptr. 3d 257·8 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7402
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2008G038594California3,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

— Christina Denkinger appeals from the order granting the motion made by the defendant, AZ3, Inc., to strike class allegations from her complaint. She contends the trial court erred in granting the motion to strike based on evidence outside the pleadings; at the least, she contends, the trial court should have given her leave to amend the complaint. Alternatively, Denkinger contends if the trial court properly relied on evidence outside the pleadings, it erred in striking the class allegations without affording her an opportunity to test the evidence through discovery.

We find the trial court correctly handled the motion under class certification guidelines, properly receiving evidence on the class certification issue and exercising its discretion in denying certification. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTS

In December 2002, John Williams and James Thornhill filed a class action complaint against AZ3, Inc., doing business as BCBG Maxazria (BCBG), on behalf of all managers and assistant managers in BCBG’s California stores during the preceding four years. The complaint alleged causes of action for failure to pay overtime compensation (Lab. Code, §§ 1194, 1197) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.