Facundo-Guerrero

Facundo-Guerrero v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 4th 640·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 820·77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 731·2 Cal. WCC 597
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2008A119814California5,558 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ruvolo, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Labor Code section 4604.5, subdivision (d) (section 4604.5(d)) was enacted in 2003 as Senate Bill No. 228 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2003, ch. 639, § 27) (Senate Bill 228), and provided that, unless approved by an injured employee’s employer, benefits for chiropractic treatments and physical therapy sessions were limited to no more than 24 visits per industrial injury, if the injury occurred after January 1, 2004. The statute was amended the following year as part of Senate Bill No. 899 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2004, ch. 34, § 25) (Senate Bill 899), a comprehensive reform of this state’s workers’ compensation system. As pertinent to section 4604.5(d), Senate Bill 899 left in place the cap on chiropractic and physical therapy visits, but added a limit of 24 occupational therapy visits per industrial injury as well.

Petitioner Jose Facundo-Guerrero (petitioner) received 76 chiropractic treatments following an industrial injury he sustained while working for respondent Nurserymen’s Exchange (Nurserymen’s), whose insurer was respondent Argonaut Insurance Company. He filed a writ of review with this court after a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.