Swan

Kitty-Anne Music Co. v. Swan

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 30·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1446·4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 796·2003 WL 22147636·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8571
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2003B158551California2,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A party successfully opposes a summary judgment motion. He then moves for summary judgment based upon the same evidence used in the summary judgment motion he resisted. The rule of judicial estoppel does not apply against the party because he has not taken inconsistent positions, nor has he disrupted the orderly administration of justice.

Kitty-Anne Music Co., Inc. and Milton Delugg, president of Kitty-Anne Music Co., Inc., appeal a summary judgment in favor of Donald Swan. We affirm.

FACTS

A1 Stillman was a popular songwriter who wrote the lyrics to many popular songs that are still performed. In 1979, he died, and his widow Pauline inherited his music royalty rights. In 1982, she granted publisher’s royalty rights to Kitty-Anne in exchange for $300,000, plus payment of the “writer’s share” of future royalties on specified Stillman songs. The 1982 agreement required Kitty-Anne to “keep complete and accurate books and records” regarding the royalties and to allow Stillman and her successors “to audit and inspect such books and records” upon reasonable notice. The agreement also required Kitty-Anne to protect and enforce the Stillman royalty rights by appropriate means,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.