Barrett

Barrett v. Rosenthal

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 749·5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 416
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2003A096451California14,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

Rehearing Granted November 10, 2003. See 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 142 .

KLINE, P.J.

Stephen J. Barrett, M.D. and Terry Polevoy, M.D. appeal from the trial court's order striking their complaint for libel, libel per se and conspiracy as a strategic lawsuit against public participation under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereafter section 425.16 or the anti-SLAPP statute). They challenge the trial court's findings that the anti-SLAPP statute applies to allegedly libelous statements respondent Ilena Rosenthal caused to be distributed on the Internet, and that appellants could not establish a probability of prevailing on their claims. They also challenge the trial court's award of attorney fees and costs to Rosenthal; its refusal to exempt their attorney from the order directing payment of Rosenthal's attorney fees and costs; and its refusal to allow appellants discovery. We shall reverse the order as it applies to appellant Polevoy and affirm it in all other respects.

Appellants Barrett and Polevoy are physicians primarily engaged in combating the promotion and use of "alternative" or "nonstandard" healthcare practices and products.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.