Henley

Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 198·5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 42
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2003A086991California22,073 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of defendant's tortious misconduct in the manufacture and marketing of cigarettes. The jury returned a special verdict awarding plaintiff $1.5 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages. The trial court denied defendant's motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, except that it ordered a new trial on punitive damages unless plaintiff consented to reduce the punitive award to $25 million. Plaintiff consented to the reduction, and defendant filed a timely appeal.

In our original opinion we affirmed the judgment in its entirety. ( Henley v. Philip Morris (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 824 , 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 494 , review granted Jan. 29, 2002, S102941 ( Henley I). ) The Supreme Court granted review and ultimately re-transferred the matter to us with directions to "vacate [our] decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 828 , 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 40 , 50 P.3d 751 [ ( Myers ) ], and Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 856 , 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 61 , 50 P.3d 769 [ ( Naegele) ]." We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.