Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Superior Court

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 423·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1500·2003 Daily Journal DAR 11117·5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 154·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8847
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2003G031386California7,566 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

I.

Introduction

In Pavlovich v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 262 [ 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 329 , 58 P.3d 2 ] (Pavlovich), the California Supreme Court held an out-of-state defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction in California based upon evidence establishing the defendant engaged in intentional conduct expressly aimed at or targeting California and the defendant knew the intentional conduct would cause harm in this state. In this case, we apply this “effects” test, as expressed in Pavlovich , and conclude the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee (the Milwaukee Archdiocese) is subject to specific personal jurisdiction in California.

Plaintiff Eric Nathan Paino alleged and declared under oath that when he was a boy, Fr. Siegfried Widera (Widera), a Roman Catholic priest, molested him. Widera was working at a parish in Orange County when the alleged molestation occurred. Paino sued the Milwaukee Archdiocese, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange (the Orange Diocese), and Widera. Paino alleged the Milwaukee Archdiocese engaged in a cover-up of Widera’s prior misconduct, which included a conviction in Wisconsin for sexual perversion against a boy, and arranged for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.