Los Angeles Times Communications LLC v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 1313·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1617·2003 Daily Journal DAR 11879·5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 776·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9468
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2003B164033California8,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

INTRODUCTION

“People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. . . .” (Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (1980) 448 U.S. 555, 572 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 973 , 100 S.Ct. 2814 ] (opn. of Burger, C. J.).)

With few exceptions, the Ralph M. Brown Act obligates government agencies to meet and act in public. (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq. (the Brown Act).) Richard P. McKee is president of the California First Amendment Coalition, a group dedicated to enforcing the Brown Act and the California Public Records Act. (§ 6250 et seq. (the Public Records Act).) This appeal arises from a suit filed by McKee and the Los Angeles Times against the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for violating the Brown Act.

Appellants’ petition sought a writ of mandate and declaratory and injunctive relief based on seven causes of action arising from various alleged Brown Act violations. The trial court granted appellants declaratory relief on three causes of action addressing three different Board meetings, but found for the Board on the other claims. Neither side sought appellate review on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.