ZACK'S, INC. v. City of Sausalito

Bad Law
165 Cal. App. 4th 1163·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1228·81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2008A118244, A118723California14,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

The questions this case poses are (1) whether a city can lawfully lease a portion of a dedicated public street to a private party for a commercial purpose, thereby impairing private and public easements therein, where the street is situated on tidelands granted the city by the Legislature arid held by it pursuant to the common law public trust relating to tidelands and submerged lands and, if so, (2) whether the power granted the city by the Legislature permits it to vacate or close the leased portion of the street without complying with general statutes applicable to the vacating or closing of public streets.

Appellant, Zack’s, Inc. (Zack’s), commenced this action against the City of Sausalito (City), the State of California, the California State Lands Commission, Paul D. Thayer, Executive Officer of the State Lands Commission (hereafter collectively the state or state respondents), and Edgewater Yacht Sales (Edgewater), claiming that the storage of boats and equipment by Edgewater on a leased portion of a street upon which Zack’s property abuts constitutes a nuisance per se. Zack’s complaint also included causes of action to quiet its title to easements of ingress and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.