Puente

People v. Puente

Good Law
165 Cal. App. 4th 1143·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1223·81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 380
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2008E043466California2,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pled guilty to one count of burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) Defendant admitted suffering a prior strike conviction. (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d).) The court sentenced defendant to state prison for a term of six years, but stayed execution of the sentence pursuant to a Vargas waiver, which will be explained, post. Defendant failed to appear for sentencing. On June 8, 2007, the court executed the six-year sentence. Defendant contends (1) the court erred by not granting him the custody credits negotiated as part of his plea bargain; and (2) the trial court violated defendant’s rights to due process by (a) not notifying defendant that he allegedly violated the terms of the Vargas waiver, and (b) not specifying a reason why defendant was found in violation of the Vargas waiver. Defendant did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (§ 1237.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b).) As to defendant’s first contention, we affirm the judgment. As to defendant’s second contention, we dismiss for failure to obtain a certificate of probable cause.

FACTS

As part of defendant’s plea bargain, the district attorney and defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.