Thottam v. Thottam

Good Law
165 Cal. App. 4th 1331
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2008B196933California4,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this case, we consider the admissibility of a document prepared during mediation under the exception to mediation confidentiality set out in Evidence Code section 1123, subdivision (c). We find the exception applies, and reverse the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Following the death of Thresiamma Thottam, disputes arose among her three children, Peter, Jameson, and Elizabeth, regarding the distribution of assets from her estate and from a trust in which the siblings were cotrastees and beneficiaries (the JPL Trust). The siblings agreed to participate in “an all-day discussion” in an attempt to resolve their disagreements.

At the start of the August 22, 2004 mediation, Peter, Jameson, and Elizabeth signed a mediation and facilitation confidentiality agreement, under which they agreed that “all matters discussed, agreed to, admitted to, or resulting from” the mediation would “(1) be kept confidential and not disclosed to any outside person (excluding spouses), (2) shall not be used in any current or future litigation between us (except as may be necessary to enforce any agreements resulting from the Meeting), and (3) shall be considered privileged and, as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.