Dean

People v. Dean

Bad Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 186·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 816·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 478·9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6352
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 2009E041513California7,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

King, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Jeffrey Farrar Dean appeals from a judgment and order committing him to the State Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator (SVP).

Defendant contends: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted plaintiff’s experts to testify to inadmissible hearsay; (2) as implemented in Riverside County, the appointment of only one expert for defendant violated his due process rights; and (3) his recommitment is illegal in that the protocols relied upon by plaintiff’s experts had not been adopted as administrative regulations. We affirm the judgment and order of recommitment.

II. SUMMARY OF FACTS

The present recommitment petition was filed on December 13, 2005. Attached to the petition were the reports of Drs. Harry Goldberg and Dawn Starr, both Department of Mental Health evaluators. For purposes of the recommitment petition, the qualifying offenses were a 1982 forcible rape conviction and a 1983 sodomy conviction. Following a probable cause hearing, a jury trial commenced in August 2006. In support of the petition, the prosecutor called Drs. Goldberg and Starr. In addition, plaintiff called defendant and submitted into evidence redacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.