Cory

Cory v. Toscano

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 1039·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 908·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 841
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2009F055231California1,933 words

Opinion

Opinion

Levy, J.

Appellant, Colleen M. Toscano, and respondent, Elaine Cory, are beneficiaries of the Louie Friguglietti Trust (Trust). Cory applied to the trial court for an advance ruling under Probate Code section 21320 on whether a proposed petition would be a contest of the Trust. This petition seeks a determination that handwritten notations on the trust document that reduce Cory’s share of a trust asset are not part of the terms of the Trust. The trial court ruled that the proposed petition did not violate the Trust’s no contest clause on the ground that a challenge to an instrument other than the instrument containing the no contest clause is not a contest under section 21305, subdivision (a)(3).

Toscano argues Cory’s proposed challenge is not protected under section 21305, subdivision (a)(3), because the handwriting is not a separate instrument or document. Toscano further contends that, contrary to Cory’s position, the proposed petition is not protected as a pleading seeking an interpretation of the Trust under section 21305, subdivision (b)(9). Rather, the petition seeks to void, nullify or set aside a trust provision.

As discussed below, Cory’s proposed challenge is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.