J. Allen Ramey, M.D., Inc. v. Pacific Foundation for Medical Care

Good Law
98 Daily Journal DAR 10329·999 F. Supp. 1355·1998 WL 162196·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4706
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 1998CIV 96-1738-B (RBB)California6,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Case Type and Jurisdiction

Plaintiff is suing Defendant under the Clayton Act for treble damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 . The Court has federal question jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 , 26 and 28 U.S.C. § 1337 . The parties have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment.

On January 22, 1998, the Court requested that the parties submit additional briefing on the following question: “Has the Plaintiff suffered an ‘antitrust injury5 cognizable under § 4 and § 16 of the Clayton Act? See 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 , 26; Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowlr-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977); Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum, 495 U.S. 328 , 110 S.Ct. 1884 , 109 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).

II. Background

Plaintiff J. Allen Barney, M.D., Inc. (“Plaintiff ) is a corporation owned by Dr. Ramey that offers ear, nose, and throat (“ENT55) medical services in San Diego County. Defendant Pacific Foundation for Medical Care (“Defendant55 or “PFMC55) is a non-profit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.