Hairston

People v. Hairston

Bad Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 231·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 820·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2009C057504California3,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

A jury convicted defendant Anthony Jerome Hairston of three misdemeanor counts of resisting arrest (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)), but it deadlocked on one felony count of making a criminal threat (§ 422). On retrial, a second jury convicted defendant of one count of criminal threat. (§ 422.) It also determined that defendant personally used a handgun in making the threat (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)), but it found not true an allegation that defendant committed the crime for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)).

The trial court sentenced defendant to a prison term totaling 13 years, based on the upper term of three years on the criminal threat count, plus the upper term of 10 years for the personal handgun use enhancement. The court also sentenced defendant to concurrent one-year terms in the county jail for the three resisting arrest counts.

Defendant appeals, raising the following contentions:

We affirm the judgment in all respects.

FACTS

Braulio Meraz lived in an Oak Park apartment complex with his wife and four children. On February 20, 2007, Meraz was outside in the complex’s parking lot talking with a friend who was working on a car.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.