Bisno

Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 1534·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 985·95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 492
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 2009B193604, B195422California8,962 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Douglas Emmett Realty Fund 1998 and Douglas, Emmett & Company appeal from the judgment entered after a jury found them liable for violating provisions of two Santa Monica rent control ordinances: (1) prohibiting notices to quit and eviction actions except on certain enumerated grounds; and (2) making unlawful demands for excessive rent. The plaintiff in that action, Robert Bisno, cross-appeals from a pretrial order summarily adjudicating that the affirmative defense of reliance on advice of counsel barred his malicious prosecution cause of action, and from the denial of his JNOV (judgment notwithstanding the verdict) motion on his breach of contract claim. We hold that there were no triable issues of fact to defeat reliance on the advice-of-counsel defense and, therefore, affirm the summary adjudication order. Finding the litigation privilege (Civ. Code, § 47, subd. (b)) applies, we reverse the judgment outright as to the rent control claims based on the eviction notice and unlawful detainer action. We also reverse the judgment as to the rent control claim for excessive rent demands but permit retrial because whether the litigation privilege applies in the present setting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.