Clark v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 82·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 135
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2009B212512California8,523 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barger & Wolen, Kent R. Keller and Larry M. Golub for Real Party in Interest.

Reed Smith, Margaret M. Grignon, Robert D. Phillips, Jr., James C. Martin and Wendy S. Albers for Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies, North American Company for Life and Health Insurance and Midland National Life Insurance Company as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.

PERLUSS, P. J.—

Civil Code section 3345 (section 3345) authorizes the award of an enhanced remedy—up to three times greater than the amount of a fine, civil penalty "or any other remedy the purpose or effect of which is to punish or deter" that would otherwise be awarded—in actions by or on behalf of senior citizens or disabled persons seeking to "redress unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition." Is this enhanced remedy available in a private action by senior citizens seeking restitution under California's unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.)?

The unambiguous language of section 3345 encompasses actions under the unfair competition law brought by or on behalf of senior citizens, even those initiated by private plaintiffs seeking only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.