Sturgeon

Sturgeon v. Bratton

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 1407·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 967·95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 718
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2009B209913California6,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Special order 40 (SO40) is the policy of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) governing interactions with illegal immigrants. It prohibits LAPD officers from initiating police action with the sole objective of discovering the immigration status of an individual and arresting individuals for illegal entry into the United States. In 1987, this court upheld SO40 against a challenge that the mere questioning of a criminal arrestee about his immigration status, and passing that information on to federal immigration officials—acts permitted by SO40—constituted unconstitutional state enforcement of federal civil immigration law. (Gates v. Superior Court (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 205, 219 [ 238 Cal.Rptr. 592 ].) We concluded that the LAPD could voluntarily transfer legitimately obtained arrest information to federal authorities without running afoul of the United States Constitution. ( 193 Cal.App.3d at p. 219 .)

Subsequently, Congress enacted a statute invalidating state and local restrictions on the voluntary exchange of immigration information with federal immigration authorities. ( 8 U.S.C. § 1373 (section 1373).) Plaintiff Harold P. Sturgeon brought a taxpayer action to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.