Cortez

Cortez v. Vogt

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 98·52 Cal. App. 4th 917·60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 841·97 Daily Journal DAR 1409·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1003
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 1997D021806California7,418 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), embodied in Civil Code section 3439 et seq., on April 30, 1993, Manuel Cortez filed an action against William Vogt, Betty Vogt and Doe defendants (collectively, the Vogts) seeking to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer occurring in August 1987. On May 20,1994, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Vogts, finding the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations set forth in section 3439.09.

Cortez appeals, contending (1) the four-year statute of limitations of section 3439.09 was tolled during the pendency of an appeal in the underlying action for wrongful termination against two corporations which were merged into another corporation during the underlying action with the assets ultimately being transferred to a corporation that did not assume the then-unsettled, but potential liability; (2) the one-year statute of limitations of section 3934.09, subdivision (a), did not begin to run until the debtor examination of William Vogt in March 1993, after the judgment against the corporations in the underlying action was final; and (3) the Vogts should be equitably estopped from asserting the statute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.