Rodriguez

People v. Rodriguez

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 72·52 Cal. App. 4th 560·60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 664·97 Daily Journal DAR 1125·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 800
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1997A073565California2,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

Introduction

Dora Jean Rodriguez appeals from a judgment of conviction for being in possession of a forged paper. She contends the trial court erred in refusing to grant her worktime credit for time spent at the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC).

Background

Rodriguez pleaded no contest to a charge of possessing a forged paper (Pen. Code, § 475) and admitted a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) in exchange for a CRC referral (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 3051). The court imposed a four-year prison term with the provision that if Rodriguez were found ineligible for CRC, the sentence would be reduced to two years (§ 1170, subd. (d)). Rodriguez was committed to CRC on November 29, 1994. In a letter dated April 28, 1995, CRC notified the court that it had reviewed Rodriguez’s suitability for the Civil Addict Program and found her “not suitable because of her current medical condition that requires treatment beyond the scope of the Civil Addict Program.” Pursuant to a court order, Rodriguez was returned to the custody of the Napa County Department of Corrections on June 4. Criminal proceedings were reinstated on June 23, 1995, and on August 8, Rodriguez was released on her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.