In Re Melvin A

Good Law
82 Cal. App. 4th 1243·98 Cal. Rptr. 2d 844
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2000B136038California3,794 words

Opinion

Opinion

CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

Defendant Maria L. appeals from orders of the juvenile court (1) discontinuing her visitation with the children, (2) denying a continuance of the hearing regarding termination of parental rights, (3) denying her counsel's request to be relieved, and (4) terminating her parental rights to her children, Melvin and Xena A. (Welf. & Inst.Code, § 366.26.) [1] Appellant contends the juvenile court committed various errors.

We conclude that to the extent appellant purports to appeal from the first three orders enumerated above, the appeal is untimely and is dismissed. Although we conclude the trial court erred in staying the order terminating parental rights pending completion of an adoptive home study, we find the error to be harmless. Finding no other error regarding the order terminating parental rights, we affirm that order.

In April 1997, Melvin (born in February 1995) and Xena (born in July 1996) were declared dependents of the juvenile court pursuant to a section 300 petition filed on their behalf in February 1997 by the Department of Children and Family Services (Department). [2] The children initially were placed in the care of their paternal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.