Groom

Groom v. Health Net

Bad Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 632·2000 Daily Journal DAR 8797·82 Cal. App. 4th 1189·98 Cal. Rptr. 2d 836·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6693
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2000B131271California3,910 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff and respondent Sarah Groom (Groom) sued defendants and appellants Health Net and Health Systems International, Inc. (collectively Health Net) and others not party to this appeal. Groom, a subscriber to a health plan administered by Health Net, a duly organized health maintenance organization (HMO), alleges that as a result of Health Net’s refusal or failure to timely provide a neurological examination, a prescription drug, and an MR angiogram and cardiac workup, Groom suffered a disabling stroke.

After demurring to Groom’s original, first amended, second amended, and third amended complaints, Health Net moved to compel arbitration of the dispute pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in the health plan. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.) The trial court denied Health Net’s petition to compel arbitration, concluding that Health Net waived its right to compel arbitration when it “entered the litigation arena” by demurring and waited for almost one year before “seek[ing] to remove this suit to arbitration.” Health Net appeals from the order denying the petition to compel arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a).)

We reverse on the ground…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.