Utility Cost Management v. INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

Good Law
82 Cal. App. 4th 231·98 Cal. Rptr. 2d 100
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2000F030932California5,695 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

Utility Cost Management (hereafter UCM or appellant) appeals from a judgment of dismissal following a demurrer that was sustained without leave to amend. The basis for the demurrer was that the statute of limitations set forth in Government Code [1] section 66022 applied to a cause of action pursuant to section 54999.4 for a refund of excessive capital facilities fee charges imposed pursuant to section 54999.3.

On February 10, 1997, UCM as the assignee of Kern Community College District (hereafter College) filed a complaint against Indian Wells Valley Water District (hereafter Indian Wells) in the Kern County Superior Court. On or about April 3, 1997, Indian Wells demurred to each cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend.

UCM filed its First Amended Complaint on or about June 5, 1997. Indian Wells again filed a demurrer and on August 13, 1997, the demurrer was sustained with leave to amend. Thereafter, UCM filed a motion for reconsideration of the trial court's August 13, 1997, order. The motion for reconsideration was granted.

A Second Amended Complaint was filed by UCM on or about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.