People v. Bankers Insurance

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 680·182 Cal. App. 4th 1377·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 346
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2010B213065California3,761 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lichtman, J.

SUMMARY

Bankers Insurance Company appeals from the denial of its motion to vacate a judgment ordering the forfeiture of an $80,000 bail bond. Bankers asserts the court had no jurisdiction to enter summary judgment against the surety on the bond, because the court (at Bankers’s request) extended the statutory time for setting aside the forfeiture beyond the time authorized by statute. As a result, summary judgment was granted after the time within which the court was authorized to do so had expired. We affirm the court’s order refusing to vacate its grant of summary judgment. Although the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it acceded to Bankers’s request to extend the time for setting aside the forfeiture, Bankers is estopped from challenging both that order and the summary judgment premised upon it.

FACTUAL, LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Bankers posted a surety bond of $80,000 to secure the appearance of defendant Karen Cholakian on a complaint alleging several felonies. Cholakian did not appear on January 29, 2007, for the setting of a preliminary hearing, and the trial court (Judge Patrick Hegarty) ordered bail forfeited. Notice of forfeiture was mailed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.