Taylor v. Hubbell Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. Hubbell

Good Law
188 F.2d 106
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 195112594California1,533 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mathes, J.

Plaintiff filed suit in Arizona’s superior court against Sanderson & Porter, a partnership, and its members for personal injuries. Diversity of citizenship existed, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 , and defendants removed the case to the federal court. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441 .

Following removal Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, plaintiff’s employer, and the Industrial Commission of Arizona, a public agency, intervened as defendants. From a judgment for plaintiff ■entered upon the jury’s verdict defendants and intervenors bring this appeal.

To expand its capacity to supply electricity Tucson Gas contracted with Sander-son •& Porter for the construction of additional generating facilities. On June 17, 1949 plaintiff, a lineman of the Tucson company, was injured by bodily contact with high-voltage electrical conductors, part of the facilities then under construction by Sanderson & Porter pursuant to the contract.

Plaintiff applied promptly to the Industrial Commission of Arizona for workmen’s compensation. He was awarded payments > covering medical expenses and loss, of wages to August 30, 1949 when he discontinued presenting claims requisite for fur- ' ther award. October 24, 1949 he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.