Atkinson

Atkinson v. Elk Corporation

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 4th 739·135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 433·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 850·2003 Daily Journal DAR 6391·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5066
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2003H023589California8,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

James Atkinson (hereinafter Atkinson) appeals from a judgment of nonsuit entered in favor of Elk Corporation (hereinafter Elk). For the reasons outlined below we will reverse.

Procedural History

Atkinson filed a complaint on December 22, 1999, against Elk and Lyle Thomas doing business as Pacific Coast Roofing (hereinafter Pacific). The first cause of action alleged breach of express warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (hereinafter Song-Beverly) (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) against Elk. The second cause of action alleged breach of implied warranty under Song-Beverly against Elk. The third cause of action alleged violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) against Elk and Pacific.

On April 25, 2001, Atkinson filed a motion to amend the complaint to add two causes of action under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) (hereinafter Magnuson-Moss); a cause of action for fraud; and a cause of action for violations of the Unfair Practices Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17000 et seq.) At the same time, he moved to continue the trial.

Shortly thereafter, Elk filed a combined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.