Schmaus

People v. Schmaus

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 4th 846·135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 521·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 857·2003 Daily Journal DAR 6453·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5052
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2003B147015California5,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

Defendants and appellants Michael Beattie (Beattie), Danny Wayne Black (Black), and Jason Schmaus (Schmaus) were convicted of first degree murder, and the jury found true the special circumstance that the murder was committed while lying in wait. At defendants’ joint trial, Robert Glenn (Glenn) testified that lie and defendants shared the beliefs of the Aryan Brotherhood and Nazi Low Riders, White prison gangs, and that because the victim violated those beliefs by committing a sex offense, Glenn and defendants killed him while they were all incarcerated.

In the published portion of this opinion, we discuss Beattie’s argument that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated by the admission of a statement his nontestifying codefendant Schmaus made that implicated Beattie in the murder. We conclude that the trial court erred in admitting the statement, but hold that the error was harmless.

In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we deal with Schmaus’s contentions that the jury was improperly instructed on the lying-in-wait special circumstance and that it was error to admit evidence concerning White prison gangs; we discuss Beattie’s additional arguments…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.