Byars

Byars v. SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc.

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 4th 1134·135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 796·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 898·2003 Daily Journal DAR 6559·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5188
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2003D040390California5,502 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

This case, an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, involves the validity of a yield spread premium (YSP) (a rebate paid to a mortgage broker by a lender) on a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured loan that has a cap of 1 percent on the loan origination fees that may be directly charged to the borrower. We conclude payment of a YSP does not violate the applicable regulations and therefore did not violate a provision in Byars’s deeds of trust requiring compliance with United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations. We further conclude that summary judgment was properly granted on Byars’s Business and Professions Code section 17200 claim alleging the lender engaged in deceptive business practices by not directly disclosing to him that his loans were at an above-par rate of interest. Finally, we reject Byars’s contention that the court erred in excluding the deposition testimony of an expert witness deposed in another case.

Factual and Procedural Background

In February 1997, Douglas S. Byars used a mortgage broker, Spectrum Financial Group (Spectrum), to obtain an FHA loan to purchase a home. Byars did not investigate interest rates,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.