WINDHAM AT CARMEL MTN. RANCH ASSOCIATION v. Superior Court

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 4th 1162·135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 834·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 899·2003 D.A.R. 6603·2003 Daily Journal DAR 6603
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2003D040584California5,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Plaintiff Windham at Carmel Mountain Ranch Association, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation (Association), filed this petition for writ of mandate challenging the trial court’s order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants The Presley Companies, Presley Homes, Presley CMR, Inc., William Lyon Homes, Inc., Carmel Mountain Ranch, Home Capital Corporation, and Humboldt Financial Services Corporation (collectively Presley) to Association’s breach of implied warranty cause of action alleged in its construction defect action against them. Association contends the trial court erred by concluding Association did not have the requisite privity of contract with Presley to state a cause of action for breach of implied warranty. Because Code of Civil Procedure section 383 provides Association with the requisite privity, we conclude the trial court erred and grant the petition.

Factual and Procedural Background

From about 1994 through 1997, Presley designed, developed, constructed, marketed and sold 120 residential condominiums in a common interest development known as Windham (Project). Presley conveyed to each buyer of a Project condominium title…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.