Needham

People v. Needham

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 210·2000 Daily Journal DAR 3103·79 Cal. App. 4th 260·93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 899·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2307
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2000F032060California2,402 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

Defendant Van Hugh Needham pled guilty to possessing methamphetamine and an opium pipe after the court denied his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, he claims (1) the police lacked reasonable suspicion to detain him, (2) he was detained for an unreasonable period of time, and (3) the inventory search was unreasonable in scope. In the published portion of this opinion we discuss matters concerning inventory searches of motorcycles. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings

In the afternoon of July 24, 1998, a Hispanic male ran from the backyard of Luz Villegas’s home to the front yard and asked Villegas if he could hide in her house. Villegas also saw a White male (defendant) drive a motorcycle around Ledbetter Park three times. The Hispanic male stopped defendant, gave him some white bags, and got on the motorcycle as a passenger. A woman driving a white van then stopped to tell Villegas she had just been robbed by a man on a motorcycle.

Villegas then telephoned 911 to report that the Hispanic male had stolen something and had left with defendant on a motorcycle. Villegas described defendant as a White male with tattoos on his arm who had left through Eddy Road, had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.