Salvato

Salvato v. Hakko Maritime Corp.

Good Law
718 F. Supp. 1443·1989 WL 102287·1989 A.M.C. 1014·1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10549
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1989C-88-5052 JPVCalifornia1,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vukasin, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HAK-KO MARITIME CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant Hakko Maritime Corporation’s (hereinafter “Hakko”) Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Michael Salvato (hereinafter “Salvato”) was working as a longshoreman clerk-supervisor on the M/V EMERALD HIGHWAY, a car carrier operated by Hak-ko, when he tripped on a “lashing padeye” which was affixed to the deck of the vessel. The padeyes are used to tied down the cars while in ocean transit. Salvato alleges that, as a result of the fall, he had to have back surgery.

Salvato’s injury occurred while the steve-doring operation was under way. According to his deposition testimony, Salvato was working on a deck which had protruding padeyes. (Salvato depo., 39:15-40:2). Sal-vato was moving about the deck, checking for damage to the cars as they were being unloaded. (Salvato depo., 18:11-19:12). Salvato further testified that he was watching one car in particular because he suspected that it might be damaged. (Salvato depo., 56:4-10, 62:19-25). Although the ship was a “beehive” of activity as the stevedore crew attempted to unload the vessel on a rushed schedule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.