Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 301·2000 D.A.R. 4121·2000 Daily Journal DAR 4121·79 Cal. App. 4th 1400·95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 51
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2000E025975California3,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

A tort cause of action for negligent spoliation of evidence cannot be maintained. We believe that this conclusion follows inexorably from two recent decisions from our Supreme Court: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1 [ 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 248 , 954 P.2d 511 ] (Cedars-Sinai), holding that no tort cause of action lies for first party intentional spoliation of evidence, and Temple Community Hospital v. Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th 464 [ 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 852 , 976 P.2d 223 ] (Temple Community), holding that no tort cause of action will lie against a third party for intentional spoliation of evidence.

We conclude, therefore, that the trial court should have granted defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on a cause of action in which plaintiff Han seeks to hold it liable for negligent spoliation of evidence. We will, therefore, grant the petition for writ of mandate.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

On October 9, 1996, Dul Han was injured in a single vehicle accident on Interstate 15 near Victorville. She was a passenger in the vehicle driven by her brother, Hai Han. Both were insured under a policy issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.