ML Direct, Inc. v. TIG Specialty Insurance

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 194·2000 Daily Journal DAR 2893·79 Cal. App. 4th 137·93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 846·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2132
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2000B130852California2,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perez, J.

Plaintiffs ML Direct, Inc., and Nancy G. Shalek appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant TIG Specialty Insurance Co. in this insurance coverage declaratory relief action. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff and appellant ML Direct, Inc. (MLD), bought a directors and officers (D&O) policy (the policy) from defendant and respondent TIG Specialty Insurance Co. (TIG) for the one-year period starting March 11, 1997. The insureds under the policy were the directors and officers of MLD. The policy applied to claims made and reported during the policy period for various wrongful acts that the insureds might commit. Plaintiff and appellant Nancy G. Shalek was at all relevant times an officer and director of MLD and was therefore an insured under the policy.

The policy excluded from coverage claims based on or connected to preexisting litigation, administrative proceedings or other hearings. On June 27, 1997, a class action lawsuit was filed against appellants and others in a New York federal district court—Petit v. Sterling Foster & Co., CV 973775 (hereafter the Petit action). When TIG denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.