Douglas

People v. Douglas

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 254·2000 Daily Journal DAR 3595·79 Cal. App. 4th 810·94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 500·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2701
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 6, 2000811 B110243California2,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coffee, J.

Defendant William R. Douglas, who is blind and suffers from other permanent disabilities, falsified information to obtain government benefits for in-home health services that were not in fact provided to him. The total amount of overpayment was about $4,770.

Defendant entered a plea of no contest to one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487) and one count of obtaining more than $400 in health care benefits by a false declaration (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 14014; referred to hereafter as section 14014). Over the People’s objection, the court suspended the imposition of sentence, placed defendant on three years’ probation, and declared the crimes to be misdemeanors under Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b) (sometimes referred to as section 17(b)).

The People appeal, arguing that section 14014 defines a “straight” felony offense rather than a “wobbler,” and could not be declared a misdemeanor under section 17(b). We reject the argument and affirm the trial court’s order.

Discussion

Penal Code section 17 provides in pertinent part: “(a) A felony is a crime which is punishable with death or by imprisonment in the state prison. Every other crime or public offense is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.