Leslie

People v. Leslie

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 635·47 Cal. App. 4th 198·54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 545·96 Daily Journal DAR 8103·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5082
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 3, 1996B095332California2,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nott, J.

The initial question this appeal presents is whether the grossly negligent discharge of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 246.3) is a “serious felony” within the definition of Penal Code section 1192.7. If it is not, then appellant Ronald E. Leslie cannot be sentenced under the “three strikes” law.

A second issue is whether, at the time of a guilty plea, the failure to obtain appellant’s admission of a “serious felony” allegation, made pursuant to section 969f, precludes the prosecution from subsequently proving it.

Facts

Appellant was charged with commercial burglary after he and a confederate broke into a store and stole a variety of items. It was also alleged that due to a 1991 violation of section 246.3, he suffered a “strike” under the three strikes law. (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i).) In committing that prior offense, appellant, who has had more than his fair share of misdemeanor and “non-serious” felony convictions, fired four .38-caliber bullets into the air at a family gathering.

After appellant’s motion to set aside the strike was denied, he entered a plea of no contest and admitted the prior offense. He was sentenced to the low term of 16 months, which was doubled under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.