Nutmeg Securities Ltd. v. McGladrey & Pullen

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 657·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 831·2001 Daily Journal DAR 11351·92 Cal. App. 4th 1435·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9112
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2001B146165California5,752 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

The underwriter of an initial public offering of a now-defunct corporation brought this action for damages against the corporation’s accounting firm, alleging the firm prepared false and misleading financial and audit reports knowing and intending the underwriter would rely on these reports in agreeing to underwrite the offering. The trial court applied a “Bily club” to the action and sustained the accounting firm’s demurrer without leave to amend. We reverse.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The complaint alleges in relevant part:

Plaintiff Nutmeg Securities, Ltd. (Nutmeg) is in the business of providing financial advice and underwriting for companies “going public” with their stock through an initial public offering (IPO). Defendant McGladrey & Pullen (McGladrey) is a firm of certified public accountants which performed accounting and auditing services for American Diversified Holdings, Inc. (AmDiv) in connection with AmDiv’s IPO.

In the fall of 1997 McGladrey and AmDiv devised a scheme by which AmDiv could launch its IPO based on false information contained in its financial reports. At the heart of this scheme was AmDiv’s representation it possessed $11 million in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.