Laborde

Laborde v. Aronson

Bad Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 119·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 749·2001 Daily Journal DAR 10247·92 Cal. App. 4th 459·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8349
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2001G022642California3,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

After an unsatisfactory divorce—almost, but not quite, a redundancy—Phillip Laborde sued his wife’s former attorney, Evan L. Ginsburg, and Susan Aronson, the psychologist retained to conduct a custody evaluation in his marital dissolution proceeding. The complaint alleges breach of contract, malpractice, defamation, conspiracy to defame, invasion of privacy, conversion, interference with contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and injunctive relief. Aronson prevailed on a motion for summary judgment and the action against Ginsburg was dismissed with prejudice in the face of the same summary judgment motion. The trial court awarded each defendant sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7. Laborde contests the judgments and the sanction award, but we find no error save our own, and therefore affirm.

At some point in the course of the Laborde marital dissolution proceedings, the attorneys handling the matter agreed to retain Dr. Aronson as an Evidence Code section 730 evaluator. Laborde agreed to advance the costs subject to a court ruling apportioning her fees. Evan Ginsburg, the attorney representing Mrs. Laborde, mailed a confirming…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.