Briscoe

People v. Briscoe

Bad Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 401·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 758·2001 Daily Journal DAR 10413·92 Cal. App. 4th 568·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8461
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2001A086570California11,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

Applying the provocative act murder doctrine, a jury convicted appellant Khyle Armando Briscoe of first degree murder, first degree robbery, and first degree burglary. It also found true a special circumstances allegation on the murder charge and firearm use allegations associated with all three offenses. (See Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 190.2, subd. (a)(17), 211, 459; see also former §§ 190.2, as amended by Stats. 1995, ch. 478, § 2 [approved by voters Mar. 26, 1996], 12022.5, subd. (a)(1), as amended by Stats. 1995, ch. 377, § 9.) Briscoe was sentenced to an indeterminate term of life imprisonment without possibility of parole with an added four-year term for firearm use in the commission of the murder. He appeals, contending that (1) he was improperly convicted of murder with special circumstances under the provocative act murder doctrine; (2) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of two statements he gave to police officers and by instructing the jury about admissions he made in those statements; (3) he was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense in violation of his constitutional rights to due process, compulsory process and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.