Tafoya

People v. Tafoya

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 681·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 719·2001 Daily Journal DAR 9951·92 Cal. App. 4th 220·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8098
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2001E029271California2,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

The scope of Penal Code section 591 (section 591)—which makes it a crime unlawfully and maliciously to injure or obstruct a telephone line “or appurtenances or apparatus connected therewith”—seems to have become a recurring appellate issue. Here, we will hold that the jury could properly find defendant Michael Martin Tafoya guilty under section 591 based on the evidence that, during an argument with his estranged wife, he removed the battery from her cordless phone. This is true even though she was still able to call the police from another phone.

I

Factual Background

On April 2, 2000, defendant argued with his estranged wife in her home. During the argument, defendant hit her in the face (whether intentionally or accidentally was disputed) while she was holding their two-and-a-half-year-old son. Defendant also threatened to kill her and her boyfriend or to have her beaten up.

At one point, Ms. Tafoya used her cordless phone to call her mother. Defendant knocked the phone out of her hand. After defendant left, Ms. Tafoya found the phone far from where it had fallen; the battery was missing. She used a different telephone in her home to call the police. When the police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.