Thunderburk

Thunderburk v. United Food & Commercial Workers' Union

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 609·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 820·2001 Daily Journal DAR 11277·92 Cal. App. 4th 1332·168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2001E029765California4,757 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

Plaintiff Nattie Thunderburk appeals summary judgment entered against her and in favor of defendant United Food & Commercial Workers’ Union, Local 324 (Local 324). Plaintiff was formerly employed by Local 324 as a secretary. After Local 324 terminated her employment, she sued Local 324 for wrongful termination. Local 324 filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted on the ground plaintiff’s contract-based wrongful termination claims were preempted by the federal Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA).

The trial court also denied plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint to add a cause of action alleging wrongful termination in violation of public policy. The court determined that the proposed cause of action was also preempted by the LMRDA.

Plaintiff contends her contract-based wrongful termination causes of action are not preempted by the LMRDA because she was not a policymaking or confidential employee. She further contends her proposed tortious wrongful termination claim was not subject to preemption because it was not a “contract claim in other garb” but, rather, was based on a completely different theory based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.