Continental Casualty Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 849·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 741·2001 Daily Journal DAR 10177·92 Cal. App. 4th 430·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8272
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 2001B147084California7,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Petitioner, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), seeks a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to vacate its order determining that Continental owed a duty to defend a particular lawsuit filed against its insureds, the real parties in interest, Paragon Homes, Inc., and related individuals and entities. Continental also seeks an order requiring the trial court to grant Continental’s motion for summary judgment on Paragon’s complaint against Continental for declaratory relief, breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. These claims all arose out of Continental’s refusal to provide a defense to Paragon in certain litigation filed in 1994 against Paragon by FN Development Company (Alpha) and related entities.

As we review this record, it is clear that FN Development was a partner or joint venturer with Paragon in a number of development and construction projects and the FN Development action was brought against Paragon to resolve certain economic disputes then existing, to dissolve their several business relationships and to provide an accounting of their mutual affairs. One of the matters of financial dispute was the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.