Harrison

People v. Harrison

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 91·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 773·2001 Daily Journal DAR 10595·92 Cal. App. 4th 780·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8590
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2001F022835California2,552 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ardaiz, J.

On December 13, 1989, the first of several informations was filed in Fresno County Superior Court against appellant Carl Franklin Harrison. On November 2, 1994, a jury convicted him as follows:

With respect to counts one through fourteen, eighteen through twenty-one, and twenty-three, the jury also found true the special allegation that in committing the offenses, Harrison engaged in substantial sexual conduct with a child under age 14 (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(8)). The jury acquitted Harrison of count fifteen, which charged a violation of section 288, subdivision (b) (forcible lewd and lascivious act on child under age 14; victim Janiva P.) as an alternative to count fourteen.

Harrison was sentenced to a total unstayed term of 121 years in prison and ordered to pay a $4,000 fine. He filed a timely notice of appeal. He now raises numerous issues, all of which fall into one of three general categories: motions for substitution of appointed counsel, competency proceedings, and trial. For the reasons which follow, we will affirm the judgment in its entirety, with the exception that we will order vacated the vexatious litigant finding and order issued July 17, 1992.

Facts

I,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.