Casillas

People v. Casillas

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 651·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 714·2001 Daily Journal DAR 9849·92 Cal. App. 4th 171·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7970
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 2001F034666California5,589 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gomes, J.

The criminal law often punishes more harshly an accused who already has a criminal conviction than an accused who has none. The three strikes law is one example. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (b)-(e).) Petty theft with a prior is another. (Pen. Code, § 666.) Vehicle Code sections 23152 and 23550 constitute yet another. Normally punishable as a misdemeanor, an offense of driving under the influence (DUI) is punishable as a felony if an accused has three “separate violations . . . which resulted in convictions” of DUI. (§§ 23152, 23536, 23540, 23546, 23550. )

At the time of the preliminary hearing of Casimero Carlos Casillas (defendant) on his fourth DUI, he had a pending DUI complaint and two “separate violations . . . which resulted in convictions” of DUI. The magistrate held him to answer, but the superior court found “no evidence” of three “separate violations . . . which resulted in convictions” of DUI and set aside the ensuing information. (Pen. Code, § 995. ) A timely People’s appeal followed. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1).)

The issue on appeal is whether pleading and proof at the preliminary hearing of three “separate violations . . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.