Welsh

Welsh v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
887 F. Supp. 1293·1995 WL 324118·1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7447
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1995C-93-3722 DLJCalifornia4,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jensen, J.

ORDER

This is a civil rights action brought by plaintiff alleging sexual harassment, sex discrimination, defamation, and retaliation in employment. In early 1993, after an investigation authorized by the San Francisco Police Commission (“Police Commission”) and a subsequent closed hearing of these charges, the Police Commission determined that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the charges. On October 14, 1993, plaintiff filed a federal complaint in this Court. Defendants moved for a protective order to prevent disclosure to the public of the tapes and transcripts of witnesses interviewed during the Police Commission’s investigation. On July 18,1994, following a hearing, Magistrate Judge F. Steele Langford found that defendants had failed to carry their burden of showing good cause for a protective order that would restrict public access to the tapes and transcripts. On July 29, 1994, defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Langford’s Order. Plaintiff timely filed an opposition. Brief of amicus curiae of San Francisco Examiner and brief of amici curiae National Organization for Women, The San Francisco Bay Guardian and SF Weekly in opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.