Temple

People v. Temple

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 4th 1750·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1129·24 Cal. Rptr. 2d 228·93 Daily Journal DAR 14265·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8365
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1993B071448California2,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Convicted by jury of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and second degree robbery (§211) with great bodily injury (§ 12022.7) appellant contends the trial court erred by giving an incorrect causation instruction (CALJIC No. 3.40 (1992 Rev.)) and by refusing to give a defense requested correct one.

We conclude the contention is mistaken and affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

It was undisputed that Alejandro Jiminez was robbed and beaten on Sunday, December 23, 1990, at approximately 8:45 p.m. near the High Hat Motel in South Los Angeles and three days later died. It was also undisputed the perpetrators included three young Black men and that Edward Temple (appellant) was one of those three men.

In dispute was who administered the final and perhaps lethal kick to the victim’s head, appellant or one of the other men.

We summarize the accounts of the three eyewitnesses.

Rosa Hernandez was walking with her fiancé, Alejandro Jimenez, to the High Hat Motel when she noticed a tall, heavy Black man (man No. 1) behind them. When she and her fiancé reached the motel driveway, man No. 1 put a headlock on her fiancé, repeatedly punched him in the temple, dragged him to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.