Gannon

Gannon v. Elliot

Bad Law
19 Cal. App. 4th 1·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 983·23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 86·93 Daily Journal DAR 12467·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7352
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1993C013128California3,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

In this medical malpractice action involving a foreign object left in plaintiff’s right hip following surgery, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the surgeon, William A. Elliot, M.D. Plaintiff claims the trial court erred prejudicially when it foreclosed the jurors from using their common knowledge in evaluating the question of negligence. We agree and reverse the judgment.

Background

Plaintiff fell and broke her right hip on December 22, 1987. The next day, defendant performed a partial right hip joint replacement on her. Plaintiff was 65 years old at the time. During the course of the operation, a gray rubber or plastic cap from a surgical instrument—measuring approximately three centimeters by one centimeter—was left in plaintiff’s hip socket (known as the acetabulum).

Throughout 1988 and early 1989, plaintiff complained of continued pain in her right hip and limited mobility. Plaintiff sought further medical treatment and on May 1, 1989, had Dr. Thomas Voegeli perform a total right hip joint replacement. During that procedure, Dr. Voegeli found what he described as a “large foreign body” (the gray rubber cap) in plaintiff’s right hip socket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.