Carberry

Carberry v. State Board of Accountancy

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 968·28 Cal. App. 4th 770·33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 788·94 Daily Journal DAR 13482·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7367
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 1994A064735California1,197 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

In this action for declaratory relief plaintiff sought a declaration that he is entitled to advertise his business as an “accounting” service even though he is not a certified public accountant. The State Board of Accountancy successfully demurred to the complaint, and the action was dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

Facts

Plaintiff is not a certified public accountant. He has completed all the eligibility requirements except for the two-year work experience requirement, but he has deliberately chosen not to fulfill that requirement. Plaintiff is an enrolled agent, admitted to practice before the Internal Revenue Service. He operates a sole proprietorship accounting and tax preparation service in San Francisco under the name “Citizens Accounting & Tax Service.”

In March 1993 the Board of Accountancy, the state agency empowered to license certified public accountants, ordered plaintiff either to cease using the term “accounting” in his business name or to add a disclaimer that plaintiff is not licensed by the state. After an exchange of correspondence with the board, plaintiff filed this lawsuit seeking a declaration of his First Amendment right to use the word “accounting”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.