Enos

People v. Enos

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 4th 1046·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 670·2005 Daily Journal DAR 4862·27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 610·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3576
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 2005F044412, F044413, F044414California930 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buckley, J.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, appellant Robert Raymond Enos was convicted of receiving stolen property, unlawful possession of a firearm, commercial (second degree) burglary, and escape from a work farm. The plea bargain resolved three separate cases and judgments (Super. Ct. Stanislaus County, case Nos. 1051885, 1053951 and 1054325). Appellant was sentenced to a stipulated term of five years in all three cases. Pursuant to Penal Code sections 1202.4, subdivision (b) and 1202.45, the trial court imposed a restitution fine and matching parole revocation fine of $600 in case No. 1054325. It imposed restitution and parole revocation fines of $200 each in cases No. 1053951 and No. 1051885. Appellant has filed a separate appeal from each case (Nos. F044412, F044413, and F044414). We consolidated the three appeals.

DISCUSSION

Appellant contends that, because the three cases ended with a comprehensive plea agreement at a single sentencing hearing, the trial court erred by imposing three separate restitution fines under sections 1202.4, subdivision (b) and 1202.45. He relies on People v. Ferris (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1272 [ 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 180 ] (Ferris), where the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.